Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?
Abstract
This is the first Cochrane Corner in the International Journal of First Aid Education, provided by Cochrane First Aid. It summarizes the findings of a Cochrane systematic review that compares the effectiveness of continuous versus interrupted chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in case of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The review was developed by the Cochrane Emergency and Critical Care Group and is published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 3, DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD0010134 (see www.cochranelibrary.com for information).
Keywords: CPR, Layperson, out-of-hospital, cardiac arrest, continuous chest compressions, CP, Bystander CPR, bystander
How to Cite:
Laermans, J., Vanhove, A., Borra, V. & De Buck, E., (2021) “Is Continuous Chest compression CPR by Untrained Bystanders More Effective than Conventional CPR with Rescue Breathing?”, International Journal of First Aid Education 4(1), 26-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.25894/ijfae.4.1.6
Downloads:
Download PDF
544 Views
217 Downloads